Logo Tandem AI assistant

Menu

Logo Tandem AI assistant

Menu

Logo Tandem AI assistant

Menu

/

Tandem vs. AI SDK Vercel: Which Should Product Teams Choose for 2026?

Dec 10, 2025

Tandem vs. AI SDK Vercel: Which Should Product Teams Choose for 2026?

Christophe Barre

co-founder of Tandem

Share on

Tandem vs Vercel AI SDK: a finished in-app copilot vs building blocks. Learn the tradeoffs, hidden costs, and when to choose each.

Updated January 06, 2026

TL;DR: Tandem is a ready-to-deploy AI copilot that embeds inside your product with a single script tag, enabling users to complete tasks, navigate features, and get help without engineering work. Vercel's AI SDK is an open-source TypeScript toolkit with 2+ million weekly downloads that provides primitives for building custom AI features from scratch.

The core difference: Tandem gives you a finished AI copilot product. AI SDK gives you the building blocks to construct one yourself.

Factor

Tandem

AI SDK (Vercel)

What it is

Ready-to-deploy AI copilot product

Open-source TypeScript toolkit

Target user

Product teams, CS leaders, CPOs

Engineers building custom AI features

Integration

1 script tag, no-code config

npm install + custom code

Time to value

Hours

Weeks to months

Engineering required

None (for core functionality)

Significant

Primary value

Sees screen → guides → takes action for users

Unified LLM API + streaming + structured output

Choose Tandem when you need in-app user guidance now, your goal is activation, support deflection, or feature adoption, and you want to ship without engineering cycles.

Choose AI SDK when you're building entirely custom AI functionality, need low-level control over LLM calls, prompts, and tools, or want complete provider portability.

What is Tandem?

Tandem is an AI copilot that lives inside your product interface. It sees what users see on screen in real-time, answers questions, provides guidance, and completes actions on behalf of users—without requiring backend integration for UI-based tasks.

Key capabilities

  • Visual context awareness: The AI sees the actual UI state, not a pre-indexed knowledge base. No RAG pipeline, no vector database, no stale context problems.

  • Task execution: Tandem can click buttons, fill forms, navigate interfaces, and complete multi-step workflows for users.

  • Proactive guidance: Detects user confusion and triggers help automatically—something an SDK cannot do out of the box.

  • No-code configuration: Product managers control tone, playbooks, guardrails, and behaviors from a dashboard without code changes.

Validated results

According to Tandem's published case studies:

  • At Aircall, Tandem lifted adoption of advanced features by 10–20%

  • At Qonto, it helped over 100,000 users discover and activate paid features including insurance and card upgrades

  • Tandem is used by companies including Qonto, Aircall, Sellsy, and Kraken

"Using Tandem feels like infusing a bit of magic into our product. It effectively addresses our navigation challenges, enabling our users to extract more value from Qonto. As a result, we see an increase in activation and a decrease in company-wide support tickets."

— Maxime Champoux, Head of Product at Qonto

Tandem was founded in 2024 by Christophe Barre and Manuel Darcemont, launched at Hexa (the startup studio behind Front, Spendesk, Aircall, and Swan), and raised $3.8M in seed funding led by Tribe Capital.

What is Vercel's AI SDK?

Vercel's AI SDK is an open-source TypeScript toolkit designed to help developers build AI-powered applications. It provides a unified API for calling different LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and others) with consistent interfaces for streaming, structured output, and tool calling.

Core components

  • AI SDK Core: Server-side functions like generateText, streamText, generateObject for LLM interactions

  • AI SDK UI: Client-side hooks (useChat, useCompletion, useObject) for building chat interfaces

  • Provider abstraction: Switch between OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and other models by changing a single line

Technical strengths

AI SDK excels at:

  • Provider portability: Unified API means you can swap openai('gpt-4o') for anthropic('claude-3-5-sonnet') without rewriting application logic

  • Streaming: First-class support for streaming responses with partial updates

  • Structured output: Generate typed JSON objects with Zod schema validation

  • Framework support: Works with React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, and Node.js

As of AI SDK 5 (released July 2025), the toolkit includes typed chat messages, agentic loop control, and dynamic tooling capabilities.

"Vercel's @aisdk is insanely good. Docs are fantastic. Great abstractions where you want them, doesn't force unnecessary ones."

— Developer review from ai-sdk.dev

Head-to-Head Comparison

What you're actually building

With AI SDK you must build...

With Tandem you configure...

Which model to call

Tone, persona, guardrails

Stream parsing logic

When/where copilot appears

Retry/error handling

What actions it can take

Context window management

Escalation rules

UI component rendering

Proactive triggers

Prompt templates

Playbooks & knowledge

Memory architecture

Brand consistency

AI SDK gives you control over plumbing. Tandem gives you control over experience.

The hidden SDK tax

When you choose AI SDK, you're also signing up to build:

Requirement

What AI SDK gives you

What you must build

Copilot UI/UX

Nothing

Trigger placement, loading states, positioning, mobile responsiveness

Guardrails & safety

Nothing

Prompt injection protection, off-topic handling, sensitive data masking

"When to help" intelligence

Nothing

User confusion detection, proactive triggering

Iteration without deploys

Every prompt change = code change = PR = deploy

N/A

Conversation design

Nothing

Tone, fallbacks, clarifying questions, escalation logic

Monitoring

Nothing

Conversation analytics, success tracking, A/B testing

Context acquisition: The fundamental difference

AI SDK approach: Stuff context into the prompt. Build a RAG pipeline. Maintain a vector database. Decide what to index. Keep it fresh.

Tandem approach: The AI sees what the user sees in real-time. No RAG pipeline to build, no vector DB to maintain, no "which docs do I index?" decisions.

Limitation to note: Tandem cannot see backend state that isn't rendered on screen. If something isn't visible to the user, it's invisible to Tandem too.

When to Choose Each

Choose Tandem when:

  1. You need in-app guidance now — not next quarter

  2. Your goal is activation, onboarding, or support deflection — the use cases Tandem was built for

  3. You don't want to build or maintain an AI feature — you want outcomes

  4. You need a visual copilot that can click, fill forms, and navigate your UI

  5. Engineering bandwidth is precious — your team should be building product, not infrastructure

Choose AI SDK when:

  1. You're building custom AI functionality from scratch — chatbots, content generators, AI-native products

  2. You need low-level control over prompts, model selection, and tool orchestration

  3. Provider portability matters — you want to switch models without major rewrites

  4. You have dedicated engineering capacity for AI feature development

  5. Your use case is unique — not user guidance or support, but something novel

The honest framing

You're not trading control for convenience. You're trading infrastructure control you never wanted for experience control you actually need.

Nobody wakes up excited to manage prompt versioning or stream parsing. They wake up wanting users to activate faster.

"Can't we just build Tandem with AI SDK?"

Technically, yes. Tandem could be built using AI SDK as a foundation.

But that's missing the point. The question isn't whether you can build it—it's whether you should.

Building a production-grade in-app copilot requires:

  • Real-time screen understanding (not just prompt engineering)

  • UI interaction layer (clicking, typing, navigating)

  • Proactive trigger logic (detecting when users need help)

  • Guardrails and safety (prompt injection, off-topic handling)

  • Escalation to humans (with full context handoff)

  • Action confirmation flows ("Are you sure you want to delete this?")

  • Monitoring and analytics infrastructure

  • Ongoing model maintenance

AI SDK gives you generateText() and streamText(). The rest is on you.

What About MCP (Model Context Protocol)?

Tandem can act on your UI without backend integration—clicks, form fills, navigation all work out of the box.

MCP integration is only needed when you want Tandem to trigger backend actions like creating a record, starting a workflow, or calling an API. For many use cases, no MCP setup is required at all.

This is different from AI SDK, where you define all tool capabilities and integrations from scratch.

Summary: Product vs. Primitives


Tandem

AI SDK

Philosophy

"Here's the product. Control the experience."

"Here are primitives. Build the product."

Best for

Product teams who want results

Engineers who want flexibility

Time investment

Hours to deploy

Weeks to months to build equivalent

Ongoing maintenance

Managed by Tandem

Your engineering team

Customization

Experience-level (tone, triggers, playbooks)

Infrastructure-level (models, prompts, tools)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Tandem or AI SDK better for user onboarding?

Tandem is purpose-built for user onboarding, activation, and support deflection. It can see screen state, guide users contextually, and complete tasks on their behalf. AI SDK provides no onboarding-specific functionality—you would need to build everything from scratch.

Can I use both Tandem and AI SDK?

Yes. Tandem handles in-app user guidance while AI SDK powers other custom AI features in your product. They serve different purposes and can coexist.

Does AI SDK support visual context like Tandem?

No. AI SDK is a toolkit for LLM interactions. It doesn't include screen understanding, UI interaction, or real-time visual context capabilities. Those would need to be built separately.

What engineering resources does each require?

Tandem: Single script tag to integrate. Product managers can configure behavior without engineering. No backend changes required for UI-based actions.

AI SDK: Requires TypeScript/JavaScript engineering. You build the AI feature, UI, error handling, monitoring, and safety layers yourself.

How do they handle multiple LLM providers?

Tandem: Manages model selection internally. You focus on the experience, not the infrastructure.

AI SDK: Provider-agnostic with first-class support for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and others. Switching providers requires changing one line of code (though prompts may need adjustment).

Which is more cost-effective?

Depends on your engineering costs. If your team's time costs $150–200/hour and building an equivalent copilot takes 3–6 months, Tandem's subscription is likely more economical. If you have dedicated AI engineering capacity and need maximum flexibility, AI SDK (which is free and open-source) may be the better investment.

Next Steps

Evaluating for your team?

If you're a CPO, Director of Product, or CTO trying to decide between building AI features internally or adopting a purpose-built solution, contact Tandem to discuss your specific use case.

We can help you evaluate:

  • Whether your use case fits Tandem's strengths

  • The build vs. buy tradeoff for your team

  • Integration requirements for your product

This comparison reflects publicly available information about Tandem (usetandem.ai) and Vercel AI SDK (ai-sdk.dev) as of December 2025. Features and capabilities may change.

Subscribe to get daily insights and company news straight to your inbox.

Keep reading

Jan 22, 2026

8

Should You Build or Buy an AI Onboarding Assistant?

Should you build or buy an AI onboarding assistant? With 40-90% of dev costs going to maintenance, most B2B SaaS teams get better ROI buying.

Christophe Barre

Jan 22, 2026

8

Should You Build or Buy an AI Onboarding Assistant?

Should you build or buy an AI onboarding assistant? With 40-90% of dev costs going to maintenance, most B2B SaaS teams get better ROI buying.

Christophe Barre

Jan 22, 2026

9

6 Appcues and Pendo Alternatives for Growth Teams Stuck at 36% Activation

6 Appcues and Pendo alternatives rated by activation impact, pricing, and whether they execute tasks or just show tooltips.

Christophe Barre

Jan 22, 2026

9

6 Appcues and Pendo Alternatives for Growth Teams Stuck at 36% Activation

6 Appcues and Pendo alternatives rated by activation impact, pricing, and whether they execute tasks or just show tooltips.

Christophe Barre

Jan 22, 2026

8

Appcues Pricing vs. Tandem AI: True Cost for B2B SaaS Onboarding

Detailed breakdown of Appcues pricing vs. Tandem AI. From MAU-based costs to real activation results with 20% lifts at companies like Aircall.

Christophe Barre

Jan 22, 2026

8

Appcues Pricing vs. Tandem AI: True Cost for B2B SaaS Onboarding

Detailed breakdown of Appcues pricing vs. Tandem AI. From MAU-based costs to real activation results with 20% lifts at companies like Aircall.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

9

AI Assistant vs. Traditional DAPs: Pendo, Appcues, and Tandem Compared

When comparing AI Assistant vs. Traditional DAPs, the key difference is contextual intelligence that adapts to user needs versus static tooltips.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

9

AI Assistant vs. Traditional DAPs: Pendo, Appcues, and Tandem Compared

When comparing AI Assistant vs. Traditional DAPs, the key difference is contextual intelligence that adapts to user needs versus static tooltips.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

11

UserGuiding vs Appcues: Which DAP Delivers Better ROI in 2026

Comparing UserGuiding vs Appcues on pricing, analytics, and ease of setup to help you choose the right digital adoption platform for your SaaS.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

11

UserGuiding vs Appcues: Which DAP Delivers Better ROI in 2026

Comparing UserGuiding vs Appcues on pricing, analytics, and ease of setup to help you choose the right digital adoption platform for your SaaS.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

10

WalkMe vs. Tandem: Implementation Speed, ROI, and AI Capabilities Compared

Choosing between WalkMe vs. Tandem depends on your goals. Employee training at scale or B2B SaaS customer activation with contextual AI help.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

10

WalkMe vs. Tandem: Implementation Speed, ROI, and AI Capabilities Compared

Choosing between WalkMe vs. Tandem depends on your goals. Employee training at scale or B2B SaaS customer activation with contextual AI help.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

14

Best WalkMe Alternatives: Enterprise DAP Options Compared

Best WalkMe Alternatives for teams comparing faster setup, lower cost, and AI that executes workflows instead of relying on brittle product tours.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

14

Best WalkMe Alternatives: Enterprise DAP Options Compared

Best WalkMe Alternatives for teams comparing faster setup, lower cost, and AI that executes workflows instead of relying on brittle product tours.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

15

Tandem vs. Pendo: AI Assistant vs. Traditional Product Tours

Tandem vs. Pendo compares contextual AI execution with analytics-driven tours, showing which approach fixes activation and reduces user drop-off.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

15

Tandem vs. Pendo: AI Assistant vs. Traditional Product Tours

Tandem vs. Pendo compares contextual AI execution with analytics-driven tours, showing which approach fixes activation and reduces user drop-off.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

13

UserGuiding vs. Pendo: A Support Ops Guide to Pricing, Analytics, and Deflection

UserGuiding vs Pendo compares onboarding speed, pricing transparency, analytics depth, and why passive tours fail to deflect support tickets.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

13

UserGuiding vs. Pendo: A Support Ops Guide to Pricing, Analytics, and Deflection

UserGuiding vs Pendo compares onboarding speed, pricing transparency, analytics depth, and why passive tours fail to deflect support tickets.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

10

UserGuiding vs. Chameleon: Mid-Market Comparison & G2 Data (2026)

UserGuiding vs. Chameleon compares pricing transparency, ease of use, design control, and why passive tours fail at real support deflection.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

10

UserGuiding vs. Chameleon: Mid-Market Comparison & G2 Data (2026)

UserGuiding vs. Chameleon compares pricing transparency, ease of use, design control, and why passive tours fail at real support deflection.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

10

Pendo vs. Appcues: The 2026 Playbook for AI-Driven PLG Activation

Pendo vs. Appcues breaks down analytics depth, onboarding speed, pricing tradeoffs, and why AI execution outperforms tooltips for B2B activation.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

10

Pendo vs. Appcues: The 2026 Playbook for AI-Driven PLG Activation

Pendo vs. Appcues breaks down analytics depth, onboarding speed, pricing tradeoffs, and why AI execution outperforms tooltips for B2B activation.

Christophe Barre

Jan 6, 2026

15

9 Data-Backed Ways to Improve Trial Activation Rate with In-App & Email

Improve trial activation rate by combining email resurrection with AI execution agents that complete setup tasks users abandon.

Christophe Barre

Jan 6, 2026

15

9 Data-Backed Ways to Improve Trial Activation Rate with In-App & Email

Improve trial activation rate by combining email resurrection with AI execution agents that complete setup tasks users abandon.

Christophe Barre

Jan 6, 2026

10

Better Alternatives to Pendo vs. WalkMe: Key Differences & Costs

Pendo vs WalkMe comparison for enterprise buyers: analytics depth vs employee training scale, plus modern AI alternatives that execute tasks.

Christophe Barre

Jan 6, 2026

10

Better Alternatives to Pendo vs. WalkMe: Key Differences & Costs

Pendo vs WalkMe comparison for enterprise buyers: analytics depth vs employee training scale, plus modern AI alternatives that execute tasks.

Christophe Barre

Dec 4, 2025

5 min

Why AI copilots are replacing support chatbots

AI chatbots have been the default for support automation, but they're fundamentally limited. They can't see what your users see, can't act on their behalf, and deliver a disconnected experience. AI copilots fix all of that.

Christophe Barre

Dec 4, 2025

5 min

Why AI copilots are replacing support chatbots

AI chatbots have been the default for support automation, but they're fundamentally limited. They can't see what your users see, can't act on their behalf, and deliver a disconnected experience. AI copilots fix all of that.

Christophe Barre

Dec 3, 2025

7 min

Where To Deploy Your AI Copilot First: A Practical Guide

Learn where to deploy your AI copilot first for maximum impact. This guide covers how to identify problem areas, evaluate opportunities, and start small before scaling across your product.

Christophe Barre

Dec 3, 2025

7 min

Where To Deploy Your AI Copilot First: A Practical Guide

Learn where to deploy your AI copilot first for maximum impact. This guide covers how to identify problem areas, evaluate opportunities, and start small before scaling across your product.

Christophe Barre

Nov 17, 2025

7 min

The AI user interface shift happening right now

AI-native interfaces make users more likely to activate & stick around. See exactly how Tandem can help you achieve it without pulling engineers off roadmap.

Christophe Barre

Nov 17, 2025

7 min

The AI user interface shift happening right now

AI-native interfaces make users more likely to activate & stick around. See exactly how Tandem can help you achieve it without pulling engineers off roadmap.

Christophe Barre

Aug 24, 2025

5 min

Your activation is broken, you just don't know where

Most teams know something's wrong but can't pinpoint exactly what. Here's the framework to find what's killing your metrics – without the guesswork.

Christophe Barre

Aug 24, 2025

5 min

Your activation is broken, you just don't know where

Most teams know something's wrong but can't pinpoint exactly what. Here's the framework to find what's killing your metrics – without the guesswork.

Christophe Barre

Sep 14, 2025

5 min

Fix your broken flows (without waiting for engineering)

Operations, support, and product teams are solving user friction themselves. Here's how to stop playing ticket whack-a-mole and actually fix what's broken.

Christophe Barre

Sep 14, 2025

5 min

Fix your broken flows (without waiting for engineering)

Operations, support, and product teams are solving user friction themselves. Here's how to stop playing ticket whack-a-mole and actually fix what's broken.

Christophe Barre