Logo Tandem AI assistant

Menu

Logo Tandem AI assistant

Menu

Logo Tandem AI assistant

Menu

/

Appcues Pricing vs. Tandem AI: True Cost for B2B SaaS Onboarding

Jan 22, 2026

Appcues Pricing vs. Tandem AI: True Cost for B2B SaaS Onboarding

Christophe Barre

co-founder of Tandem

Share on

Detailed breakdown of Appcues pricing vs. Tandem AI. From MAU-based costs to real activation results with 20% lifts at companies like Aircall.

Updated January 22, 2026

TL;DR: Appcues shows tooltips that say "click here, then here." Tandem lets users type what they're trying to do, then navigates to the right screen, assists with setup, and completes configuration steps on their behalf. Instead of following a scripted tour, users describe their goal—set up a CRM integration, create a campaign for a specific segment, configure billing rules—and Tandem handles the multi-step workflow while they watch. Choose Appcues ($249-$879/mo) for feature announcements and simple linear tours. Choose Tandem for complex B2B products where setup involves multiple screens, conditional logic, and decisions that depend on each user's specific context.

Only 5% of users complete multi-step product tours. At 36% baseline activation, roughly 64% of trial users never reach their aha moment. The problem isn't that your tours are broken. It's that passive, pre-scripted guidance doesn't match how users actually explore complex B2B software. They need help when they're stuck, answers when they're confused, and guidance that adapts to their specific workflow.

Traditional Digital Adoption Platforms like Appcues haven't solved this problem. Despite pre-scripted tours and tooltips, industry benchmarks show that 36% of users activate, meaning roughly 64% never reach their aha moment. Users abandon incomplete workflows, ignore generic tooltips that don't match their context, and struggle through trial periods without the adaptive guidance they need.

The core issue is that traditional DAPs provide fixed tooltips when users need adaptive help. A tooltip showing where a button is doesn't understand whether a user needs an explanation of what a complex field means, step-by-step guidance through a workflow, or help completing a repetitive task. Tandem is a DAP trained on your app that understands what users see, recognizes their context and goals, and adapts its response. It explains concepts when users are confused, guides them through decisions when they're unsure of next steps, or executes tasks when they need speed.

This article breaks down the true total cost of ownership, technical architecture differences, and when each tool makes sense for your product organization.

How Does Appcues Work vs. AI-Powered Chatbots: Product Tours vs. Context-Aware Assistance

Only 5% of users complete multi-step product tours. At 36% baseline activation rates, roughly 64% of trial users never reach their aha moment. The behavioral problem is clear: users don't engage with passive, pre-scripted guidance that plays the same way for everyone regardless of their context or goals.

Appcues is a layer that sits on top of your product. It combines modals, slideouts, tooltips and hotspots to build in-product tours and walkthroughs that draw attention to specific UI elements. When a user logs in, Appcues triggers a pre-scripted sequence that highlights buttons, shows modal windows, and provides text explanations. The user follows the tour but still does all the work themselves.

Tandem is a DAP trained on your app that integrates through the DOM. It sees your actual screen state, understands user context and goals, and can explain features, guide workflows, or complete tasks on their behalf based on what each user needs. The distinction is adaptive assistance that responds to user context rather than fixed tours that play the same way for everyone.

User experience comparison:

A trial user lands on your integration setup page. With Appcues, they see a tooltip: "Click this button to connect your CRM." They click it. Now they face a 12-field form. The tooltip offers generic guidance about completing fields, but it can't explain what belongs in "API Endpoint URL" or "Webhook Secret" based on their specific CRM system. The user gets stuck, opens a support ticket, or abandons the workflow entirely.

With Tandem, they ask "Help me connect my CRM." The AI sees their screen, understands they're using Salesforce, and adapts its response to what they need. If they ask "What's an API endpoint?", it explains the concept in the context of their specific integration. If they say "I'm not sure what to enter here," it guides them through finding the right values in Salesforce's admin panel. If they say "Just set this up for me," it can execute the connection sequence. The user reaches activation in minutes instead of abandoning.

Another example where explanation solves the problem:

A user exploring your analytics dashboard sees a metric labeled "Weighted Pipeline Value" but doesn't understand what it means or why it differs from their total pipeline. With Appcues, they might see a tooltip: "This shows your weighted pipeline." Helpful, but it doesn't answer their actual question.

With Tandem, they ask "What's the difference between weighted and total pipeline?" The AI explains that weighted pipeline applies probability percentages to each deal stage, shows them which deals are being weighted differently on their current screen, and explains why this metric helps forecast more accurately than raw totals. The user understands the feature and starts using it. No task execution needed, just contextual explanation at the moment of confusion.

How the platforms handle UI evolution:

Both platforms require ongoing content management as your product changes. The difference is in how they identify elements. Appcues uses CSS selectors captured from your HTML. When those selectors change during development, tooltips may need updates. Tandem uses AI to understand screen context in real-time, identifying elements by semantic meaning and visible text rather than technical paths. This reduces (but doesn't eliminate) the need for updates when your UI changes.

Technical limitation to acknowledge:

Tandem cannot see backend state that is not rendered on screen. If something is not visible to the user, it is invisible to us too. This means we work best for UI-level workflows where state is visible, not for backend processes hidden from the DOM.

Implementation:

Appcues requires under an hour for the initial snippet, then developer time for user properties and events. Tandem uses a one-time SDK installation via script tag. At Aircall, implementation took days using a JavaScript snippet. Instead of spending months building their own solution, they were live immediately.

Both platforms require ongoing work to keep content current as your product evolves. Product and CX teams typically manage this through knowledge bases and tour updates.

Product Tours vs. AI Chatbots: When to Use Tooltips, Guided Workflows, or Task Automation

What Appcues does well

Appcues excels at passive guidance for simple, linear user journeys. The platform captures customer feedback from NPS to open text while users are in the moment and can inject carousels, inline banners, and other callouts alongside your app content.

Best use cases for Appcues:

  1. Marketing announcements: Promoting new features or plan upgrades through modal windows

  2. Simple feature callouts: Basic tooltips that say "Click here to access reports"

  3. NPS surveys: In-app feedback collection at key moments

  4. Stable UI products: Applications where CSS structure rarely changes

The Essentials plan at $249 per month includes up to 1,000 MAUs, 5 user licenses, and 5 audience segments. It works best for smaller startups with simple onboarding needs and predictable user paths.

"Support and billing could be better; lots of great features including ability to survey users" - Verified User on G2

Where Appcues struggles with context

Product tours assume everyone follows the same path, but users rarely do. In my experience working with B2B SaaS teams, users skip steps, get distracted, and come back days later. Pre-scripted tours lack the context awareness to handle these real-world usage patterns. When users deviate from the expected sequence, generic tooltips cannot adapt to their current situation or goals.

More critically, Appcues cannot understand what the user is trying to accomplish or adapt its response accordingly. It provides the same instructions regardless of:

  • The user's current screen location or workflow progress

  • The user's role, permissions, or account configuration

  • Whether the user needs conceptual explanation, step-by-step guidance, or task completion

  • The complexity of the decision the user faces

  • The technical context of fields requiring input

How Tandem adapts: Context-aware AI trained on your product

Tandem is an AI-powered digital adoption platform that understands user context. Behind the persistent "Do it with AI" button that lives inside existing products is AI trained on your specific application. Rather than delivering one-size-fits-all instructions, Tandem sees what users see, understands their goals, and provides the right type of help.

Context-aware assistance capabilities:

AI chatbots read your help docs and generate text responses, but they do not see what your user sees. When someone is stuck mid-workflow, a chatbot says "click the blue button" but there is no blue button visible. Tandem sees the actual screen, understands the current state, and adapts its response based on what the user needs in that moment.

When Tandem explains:

Some situations require understanding, not action. For complex calculations, pricing decisions, or feature value, users need conceptual clarity before moving forward. Tandem can explain how account limits work, break down pricing tiers based on the user's usage patterns, or clarify what happens when they enable specific settings—all within the context of what's visible on their screen.

When Tandem guides:

For multi-step processes where users benefit from understanding each decision point, Tandem provides contextual guidance that adapts to the user's progress. Rather than forcing a linear path, it meets users where they are. A user can ask "How do I add a user?" from any page, and Tandem provides guidance based on their current location, permissions, and account configuration.

When Tandem completes tasks:

At Qonto, Tandem helped direct over 100,000 users to discover and activate paid features such as insurance and card upgrades. Maxime Champoux, Head of Product at Qonto, noted that Tandem effectively addresses navigation challenges, enabling users to extract more value, resulting in increased activation and decreased company-wide support tickets.

At Aircall, Tandem lifted adoption of advanced features by 10 to 20%. More specifically, there was a 20% increase in user activation for self-serve accounts. The 20% activation increase changed Aircall's economics for serving small accounts because users who previously required human CS support could now activate through AI assistance.

For repetitive configuration tasks, OAuth flows for integrations, or technical field completion, Tandem can handle the work on the user's behalf—filling form fields with appropriate values, navigating multi-step workflows, and configuring settings based on user intent.

Non-linear support:

Tandem responds to what is actually on screen and adapts to each user's real journey, recapturing them when they need help regardless of where they are in the product. This context awareness means Tandem can provide different types of assistance based on what each specific user needs in their current situation, rather than forcing everyone through the same scripted experience.

Appcues Pricing Breakdown 2026: MAU-Based Costs vs. AI Digital Adoption Platform Pricing

Appcues pricing breakdown

Appcues has three pricing plans: Essentials, Growth, and Enterprise. The Essentials plan costs $249 per month paid annually, Growth costs $879 per month paid annually for 2,500 Monthly Active Users, and Enterprise has custom pricing.

Essentials Plan ($249/month, billed annually):

Growth Plan ($879/month, billed annually):

  • Up to 1,000 MAUs (higher tiers available)

  • 15 user licenses

  • 100 audience segments

  • Premium integrations (Slack, Salesforce, Marketo, Zendesk)

  • Resource center, NPS, persistent icons included

  • Custom CSS access

MAU-based pricing considerations:

Appcues charges based on MAUs, not flows shown. If a new user logs in, they will be counted and considered against the MAU total on your plan, regardless of whether they have seen a flow or not. When exceeding MAU limits, you will be charged a prorated upgrade fee to move to the correct MAU tier for the remaining months in your contract.

This pricing model penalizes growth. As your user base expands, you pay more even if those users never interact with onboarding flows or derive value from Appcues. You are essentially paying for every user who logs in, not for outcomes achieved.

"Support and billing could be better. Lots of great features including ability to survey users"- Verified User on G2

Tandem pricing philosophy

We do not publish pricing publicly because implementation varies based on user volume, complexity, and specific needs. However, our pricing philosophy centers on value delivered rather than vanity metrics like MAUs.

Build vs. buy economics:

The comparison to consider is not Tandem vs. Appcues subscription costs. It is Tandem subscription vs. building AI execution infrastructure in-house. If your team's engineering costs run $150 to 200 per hour and building an equivalent assistant requires significant development time, the subscription economics become favorable quickly.

According to IT Magination's analysis of custom AI copilot development, first year development costs can reach approximately $804,000 with around 10 full-time engineers (including architects, senior developers, quality assurance specialists, business analysts, and data engineers) for fully custom builds. Even simpler implementations require substantial resources and ongoing maintenance.

Value delivered:

Our infrastructure helps you scale support without scaling headcount. Human support is expensive, and every extra ticket needs another person. That math does not work long-term. Use your team for high-value accounts and complex edge cases. Let Tandem handle predictable questions at scale automatically.

Total cost of ownership comparison

At 36% baseline activation, roughly 64% of trial users never reach their aha moment. If you convert 10,000 trials annually at 36% activation, that is 3,600 activated users. Improving activation to 50% means 5,000 activated users, adding 1,400 conversions without spending more on acquisition. At $100 average revenue per user annually, that is $140,000 in incremental revenue from the same trial volume.

Implementation speed matters for time-to-value. Appcues tours can launch in days once configured. Tandem typically deploys in similar timeframes for basic use cases, with more complex contextual assistance taking additional weeks for content development.

Cost Category

Appcues

Tandem

Base subscription

$249 to $879+ per month

Custom (contact sales)

Implementation time

Days for basic tours

Days to weeks depending on scope

MAU overage fees

Prorated upgrades when you exceed limits

Not MAU-based

Content management

Product/CX teams create and update tour content

Product/CX teams configure AI responses and workflows

Assistance capability

Guided tours only

Explains concepts, guides workflows, executes tasks

Both platforms require ongoing content work. Product and CX teams write messages, refine targeting, and update content as products evolve. This work happens regardless of which platform you choose. The difference is in what you can deliver with that content. Appcues tours guide users through fixed paths. Tandem adapts between explaining concepts, guiding workflows, and executing tasks based on what each user actually needs in the moment.

Comparing Implementation Requirements and Business Impact

Initial deployment

Both platforms start with JavaScript snippet installation. You can install Appcues in under an hour, adding the snippet via tag manager or directly to your codebase. However, full setup still requires developer time to identify users by passing properties like user ID, email, role, and plan, and to instrument events for advanced targeting or analytics.

We deploy with a single script. Your team can build and deploy agents in under 10 minutes. Engineers might need to do a one-time SDK installation by copying and pasting a script tag, but after that, product teams can manage ongoing changes without engineering involvement.

Ongoing maintenance reality

All digital adoption platforms require continuous content refinement. According to enterprise DAP market research, custom configuration and onboarding support for enterprise systems often require dedicated technical teams.

With Tandem, product teams build and deploy agents quickly, then manage ongoing updates through our knowledge base system. The auto-adaptive architecture adapts to UI changes automatically. When you ship a new feature, you update the knowledge base with plain-language descriptions, and Tandem incorporates those changes without requiring CSS selector updates.

Real-world cost comparison

In my experience evaluating onboarding infrastructure, the calculation that matters is time-to-value and activation impact. Product teams need solutions that deploy quickly and deliver measurable improvements to trial-to-paid conversion.

Implementation speed tells the story. At Aircall, deployment took days, and the product team manages ongoing updates without engineering support. Traditional DAPs require months of implementation, CSS selector configuration, and ongoing maintenance when UI changes. This means faster time-to-value and your team focused on improving activation metrics instead of maintaining guidance infrastructure.

The architectural difference is simple: Tandem adapts to UI changes through knowledge base updates, while traditional DAPs require selector reconfiguration. For product teams shipping frequent updates, this translates to sustained activation improvements without recurring implementation work.

When to Choose Product Tours vs. AI Chatbots: Decision Guide for B2B SaaS Products

Choose Appcues if you have:

1\. Extremely simple product flows: Your onboarding requires fewer than 3 steps, users rarely deviate from the expected path, and the workflows are genuinely self-explanatory with minimal guidance.

2\. Stable UI that changes infrequently: You ship major UI updates less than once per quarter, your CSS architecture is locked, and you do not plan significant design system changes.

3\. Primary need for marketing announcements: You mostly want to promote new features through modals and banners rather than help users complete complex tasks.

4\. Very low MAU count: You have fewer than 500 MAUs and 5 or fewer user segments, making the Essentials plan viable without frequent overages.

5\. Product or CX team capacity for content updates: You have team members who can update tour content and targeting rules when needed without pulling engineering resources.

Choose Tandem if you have:

1\. Complex B2B product workflows: Your users face multi-step setup processes, technical configuration decisions, integration flows, or permission management that passive tours cannot adequately explain, guide through, or execute.

2\. Fast-moving product development: You ship UI updates weekly or bi-weekly, refactor component architecture regularly, and need onboarding guidance that adapts to product changes.

3\. Activation as a critical metric: Your trial-to-paid conversion is below 20%, activation rate under 40%, or you know that users who complete core setup convert at significantly higher rates.

4\. Support ticket volume driven by "how do I" questions: Your CS team spends significant time answering repetitive questions about product usage that could be deflected through contextual AI guidance.

5\. Need for task execution, not just guidance: Your users benefit more from having forms filled, settings configured, and integrations connected automatically than from being shown where buttons are located.

Our infrastructure lets you scale help without scaling headcount, using your CS team for high-value accounts and complex edge cases while AI handles predictable workflows automatically.

The honest technical assessment

In my assessment, Appcues is mature, predictable, and adequate for simple use cases. If you need basic tooltips and your UI is stable, it will work. The subscription cost is transparent, the implementation is straightforward, and the feature set covers fundamental onboarding needs.

Tandem represents a different category. You are not buying tour software. You are implementing AI that can explain concepts, guide users through workflows, and execute tasks users find difficult. This requires a different evaluation framework focused on activation lift, support deflection economics, and engineering leverage rather than feature parity with traditional DAPs. Both platforms require ongoing content management, though we minimize updates needed by adapting to UI changes through knowledge base updates rather than CSS selector reconfiguration.

For product leaders evaluating this decision, the critical question is not "Which has more features?" but "Which approach actually improves activation rates?" If your baseline activation sits below 40% and users abandon during complex workflows, passive guidance has already failed. The data from Aircall's 20% activation lift and Qonto's 100,000+ users activated shows that contextual AI assistance drives measurable activation improvement when onboarding complexity is high.

Schedule a 20-minute demo where we'll show Tandem guiding users through your actual onboarding workflow. You'll see how explain/guide/execute modes adapt to different user contexts and drive activation outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tandem's security posture?

We follow enterprise security standards including encryption and data protection practices. For specific security credentials and compliance certifications, contact our team for detailed documentation.

Does Tandem support mobile apps?

We currently focus on web applications. Our platform works with any modern web app built with React, Vue, Angular, or other frameworks.

Can Appcues execute tasks like Tandem?

No. Appcues provides guidance through tooltips, modals, and slideouts but cannot fill forms, click buttons, or execute workflows on behalf of users.

How long does Tandem implementation take compared to Appcues?

Both use JavaScript snippets that install quickly. Appcues requires ongoing developer time for user properties, event instrumentation, and CSS selector fixes, while we require minimal engineering involvement after initial setup. Both platforms require content management work, though our knowledge base approach means updates focus on improving guidance quality rather than fixing technical breakage.

Key Terminology

Digital Adoption Platform (DAP): Software layered on top of other applications that helps accelerate proficiency by directing users through key tasks and providing interpretive information as users navigate. Traditional DAPs like Appcues use UI overlays rather than task execution.

DOM Manipulation: Programmatically changing a web page's content, structure, or behavior through JavaScript. This enables Tandem to complete tasks by filling forms and clicking buttons rather than just pointing at them.

Agentic AI: AI systems that can take actions to achieve a goal rather than just provide information. Agentic AI assists or acts on behalf of users by performing tasks like generating code, automating workflows, or executing product configurations.

Subscribe to get daily insights and company news straight to your inbox.

Keep reading

Jan 22, 2026

8

Should You Build or Buy an AI Onboarding Assistant?

Should you build or buy an AI onboarding assistant? With 40-90% of dev costs going to maintenance, most B2B SaaS teams get better ROI buying.

Christophe Barre

Jan 22, 2026

8

Should You Build or Buy an AI Onboarding Assistant?

Should you build or buy an AI onboarding assistant? With 40-90% of dev costs going to maintenance, most B2B SaaS teams get better ROI buying.

Christophe Barre

Jan 22, 2026

9

6 Appcues and Pendo Alternatives for Growth Teams Stuck at 36% Activation

6 Appcues and Pendo alternatives rated by activation impact, pricing, and whether they execute tasks or just show tooltips.

Christophe Barre

Jan 22, 2026

9

6 Appcues and Pendo Alternatives for Growth Teams Stuck at 36% Activation

6 Appcues and Pendo alternatives rated by activation impact, pricing, and whether they execute tasks or just show tooltips.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

9

AI Assistant vs. Traditional DAPs: Pendo, Appcues, and Tandem Compared

When comparing AI Assistant vs. Traditional DAPs, the key difference is contextual intelligence that adapts to user needs versus static tooltips.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

9

AI Assistant vs. Traditional DAPs: Pendo, Appcues, and Tandem Compared

When comparing AI Assistant vs. Traditional DAPs, the key difference is contextual intelligence that adapts to user needs versus static tooltips.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

11

UserGuiding vs Appcues: Which DAP Delivers Better ROI in 2026

Comparing UserGuiding vs Appcues on pricing, analytics, and ease of setup to help you choose the right digital adoption platform for your SaaS.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

11

UserGuiding vs Appcues: Which DAP Delivers Better ROI in 2026

Comparing UserGuiding vs Appcues on pricing, analytics, and ease of setup to help you choose the right digital adoption platform for your SaaS.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

10

WalkMe vs. Tandem: Implementation Speed, ROI, and AI Capabilities Compared

Choosing between WalkMe vs. Tandem depends on your goals. Employee training at scale or B2B SaaS customer activation with contextual AI help.

Christophe Barre

Jan 21, 2026

10

WalkMe vs. Tandem: Implementation Speed, ROI, and AI Capabilities Compared

Choosing between WalkMe vs. Tandem depends on your goals. Employee training at scale or B2B SaaS customer activation with contextual AI help.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

14

Best WalkMe Alternatives: Enterprise DAP Options Compared

Best WalkMe Alternatives for teams comparing faster setup, lower cost, and AI that executes workflows instead of relying on brittle product tours.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

14

Best WalkMe Alternatives: Enterprise DAP Options Compared

Best WalkMe Alternatives for teams comparing faster setup, lower cost, and AI that executes workflows instead of relying on brittle product tours.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

15

Tandem vs. Pendo: AI Assistant vs. Traditional Product Tours

Tandem vs. Pendo compares contextual AI execution with analytics-driven tours, showing which approach fixes activation and reduces user drop-off.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

15

Tandem vs. Pendo: AI Assistant vs. Traditional Product Tours

Tandem vs. Pendo compares contextual AI execution with analytics-driven tours, showing which approach fixes activation and reduces user drop-off.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

13

UserGuiding vs. Pendo: A Support Ops Guide to Pricing, Analytics, and Deflection

UserGuiding vs Pendo compares onboarding speed, pricing transparency, analytics depth, and why passive tours fail to deflect support tickets.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

13

UserGuiding vs. Pendo: A Support Ops Guide to Pricing, Analytics, and Deflection

UserGuiding vs Pendo compares onboarding speed, pricing transparency, analytics depth, and why passive tours fail to deflect support tickets.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

10

UserGuiding vs. Chameleon: Mid-Market Comparison & G2 Data (2026)

UserGuiding vs. Chameleon compares pricing transparency, ease of use, design control, and why passive tours fail at real support deflection.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

10

UserGuiding vs. Chameleon: Mid-Market Comparison & G2 Data (2026)

UserGuiding vs. Chameleon compares pricing transparency, ease of use, design control, and why passive tours fail at real support deflection.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

10

Pendo vs. Appcues: The 2026 Playbook for AI-Driven PLG Activation

Pendo vs. Appcues breaks down analytics depth, onboarding speed, pricing tradeoffs, and why AI execution outperforms tooltips for B2B activation.

Christophe Barre

Jan 15, 2026

10

Pendo vs. Appcues: The 2026 Playbook for AI-Driven PLG Activation

Pendo vs. Appcues breaks down analytics depth, onboarding speed, pricing tradeoffs, and why AI execution outperforms tooltips for B2B activation.

Christophe Barre

Jan 6, 2026

15

9 Data-Backed Ways to Improve Trial Activation Rate with In-App & Email

Improve trial activation rate by combining email resurrection with AI execution agents that complete setup tasks users abandon.

Christophe Barre

Jan 6, 2026

15

9 Data-Backed Ways to Improve Trial Activation Rate with In-App & Email

Improve trial activation rate by combining email resurrection with AI execution agents that complete setup tasks users abandon.

Christophe Barre

Jan 6, 2026

10

Better Alternatives to Pendo vs. WalkMe: Key Differences & Costs

Pendo vs WalkMe comparison for enterprise buyers: analytics depth vs employee training scale, plus modern AI alternatives that execute tasks.

Christophe Barre

Jan 6, 2026

10

Better Alternatives to Pendo vs. WalkMe: Key Differences & Costs

Pendo vs WalkMe comparison for enterprise buyers: analytics depth vs employee training scale, plus modern AI alternatives that execute tasks.

Christophe Barre

Dec 10, 2025

12 min

Tandem vs. AI SDK Vercel: Which Should Product Teams Choose for 2026?

Tandem vs Vercel AI SDK: a finished in-app copilot vs building blocks. Learn the tradeoffs, hidden costs, and when to choose each.

Christophe Barre

Dec 10, 2025

12 min

Tandem vs. AI SDK Vercel: Which Should Product Teams Choose for 2026?

Tandem vs Vercel AI SDK: a finished in-app copilot vs building blocks. Learn the tradeoffs, hidden costs, and when to choose each.

Christophe Barre

Dec 4, 2025

5 min

Why AI copilots are replacing support chatbots

AI chatbots have been the default for support automation, but they're fundamentally limited. They can't see what your users see, can't act on their behalf, and deliver a disconnected experience. AI copilots fix all of that.

Christophe Barre

Dec 4, 2025

5 min

Why AI copilots are replacing support chatbots

AI chatbots have been the default for support automation, but they're fundamentally limited. They can't see what your users see, can't act on their behalf, and deliver a disconnected experience. AI copilots fix all of that.

Christophe Barre

Dec 3, 2025

7 min

Where To Deploy Your AI Copilot First: A Practical Guide

Learn where to deploy your AI copilot first for maximum impact. This guide covers how to identify problem areas, evaluate opportunities, and start small before scaling across your product.

Christophe Barre

Dec 3, 2025

7 min

Where To Deploy Your AI Copilot First: A Practical Guide

Learn where to deploy your AI copilot first for maximum impact. This guide covers how to identify problem areas, evaluate opportunities, and start small before scaling across your product.

Christophe Barre

Nov 17, 2025

7 min

The AI user interface shift happening right now

AI-native interfaces make users more likely to activate & stick around. See exactly how Tandem can help you achieve it without pulling engineers off roadmap.

Christophe Barre

Nov 17, 2025

7 min

The AI user interface shift happening right now

AI-native interfaces make users more likely to activate & stick around. See exactly how Tandem can help you achieve it without pulling engineers off roadmap.

Christophe Barre

Aug 24, 2025

5 min

Your activation is broken, you just don't know where

Most teams know something's wrong but can't pinpoint exactly what. Here's the framework to find what's killing your metrics – without the guesswork.

Christophe Barre

Aug 24, 2025

5 min

Your activation is broken, you just don't know where

Most teams know something's wrong but can't pinpoint exactly what. Here's the framework to find what's killing your metrics – without the guesswork.

Christophe Barre

Sep 14, 2025

5 min

Fix your broken flows (without waiting for engineering)

Operations, support, and product teams are solving user friction themselves. Here's how to stop playing ticket whack-a-mole and actually fix what's broken.

Christophe Barre

Sep 14, 2025

5 min

Fix your broken flows (without waiting for engineering)

Operations, support, and product teams are solving user friction themselves. Here's how to stop playing ticket whack-a-mole and actually fix what's broken.

Christophe Barre